Hm, why might Van Der Zwaan have been in contact with Gates in mid-August 2016pic.twitter.com/gjgMs6EpRz
-
Why's that dispositive for a hypothesis that they reconnected owing to heat from the cash-ledger story?
-
-
August, since the information sheet references as a mid-August 2016 text convo with Gates that Van Der Zwaan lies about representing their final communication.
-
Sure. And the information ALSO references a September convo that was destroyed (and doesn't dispute that the mid-August one was, as described, innocuous).
-
You think the cash ledger is a red herring? (Or are we talking past one another)
-
No. But I think pointing to August publication of cash ledger to explain innocuous August text that was not destroyed is not a winning argument.
-
Not making an argument in the slightest. Noting a coincidence with potential explanatory capability as a possible hypothesis for the reconnection.
-
Except your coincidence is not one. Suggesting that maybe keep looking for something that is actually co-incident with an event in September?
-
All I'm saying is you don't have a coincidence. You have a likely explanation for a coverup a month later, but the Q of timing remains unexplained and obviously key.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
We need a Special Counsel for this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.