Gonna repeat this again: What Goldman commented on was entire universe of IRA on FB. What Mueller indicted (and therefore commented on) was IRA activity that was illegal. Totally different things. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/19/in-two-so-called-fact-checks-of-facebook-nyt-forgets-everything-it-knows-about-indictments/ …
-
-
Does that mean the rest of the FB chaos-making is not bad? Nope. Gotta find a way to fix that (or better yet, get off FB). But that's not what Mueller indicted and it's not clear he could.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just trying to get them on a “process crime”
-
Probably not the right answer.
-
I like the idea of Mueller assembling a world-class team of prosecutors just to trick Trump lackeys with gotcha questions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is your theory
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Florida Republicans are actually the ones who most concretely can be shown to have benefited from the stolen documents from the Democrats. So, it may be that we’re going to see the Florida activity tied back in to the actual hack and leak later on." Marcy Wheeler
@democracynowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're right. My experience was only with how administrative orders in pollution cases were prepared, but selection of what elements from investigation to include was deliberate, often painstaking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.