In snotty piece about indictment of Internet trolls that claims "large numbers of Americans are ill-equipped to assess credibility of the things they read," Evan Osnos admits Mueller "trolling" the press.https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/reading-the-mueller-indictment-a-russian-american-fraud …
-
-
So many people are confused about that. We just got back a review of a paper for a tech conference and the reviewer made the same mistake. No! They're different things! Grr.
-
I especially love when journalists do it bc they rely on anonymous sources rather than pseudonymous ones.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But, didn’t
#CrookedHillary win the popular vote?#13RussianTrolls Fail ..pic.twitter.com/Vi0jApSmEE
-
So the popular vote *should* be the more valid claim to legitimacy? I tend to agree, but we're stuck with the bastardized EC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I read your work frequently because I consider you smart and knowledgeable even though I don't have the background to judge that. I have to rely a bit on my senses here. And now I sense that you really think this thread makes you look good. It doesn't.
-
To whom do you think ew is trying to "look good?"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.