Graham and Grassley Are Seeing Christopher Steele's Ghost Where Mike Flynn Lurks https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/12/graham-and-grassley-are-seeing-christopher-steeles-ghost-where-mike-flynn-lurks/ …
Show this thread
-
5) yet only a week or two later, Strzok conducts ambush interview with Flynn over the convos. He would've already have known what he spoke about based on the surveillance, yet he interviewed him anyways. Based on the 302, Flynn lied by saying "he couldn't recall".
3 weeks later. After Flynn publicly lied about what he had been doing. You've seen the 302?
-
-
I don't think that chronology is right. The Strzok interview came before leak and Pence denial. I'm not totally sure though, I'll check on it... The Strzok 302 is what the Flynn plea is based on.
-
So no, you haven't seen the 302.
-
No, but I read the guilty plea based on the 302.
-
You're misreading what the plea said. It said he affirmatively denied asking Russia not to escalate. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.4.0.pdf …
-
Ok.. I'm not saying Flynn didn't lie about the convo (although it's purely based on Strzok's 302, no recording of interview with FBI). Why even ask the question if they already knew the answer through the surveillance??
-
Because they had intercepts saying Russia affirmatively wanted Trump elected, for one? Because they knew Flynn had taken $$ from RU and not disclosed it?
-
They do?? Where are these intercepts (besides Steele)?... Half of Washington would be in jail for FARA violations, where's the podestas indictment??
-
Podesta, whose business shut down in the wake of the Manafort indictment? That one? Where do you think the NSA stores their intercepts?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.