It wouldn't be unusual for Rosenstein to have extensively consulted his highest ranking deputy about the ongoings of the sc investigation would it? Genuinely wondering.
Repeating something I said yesterday: as people report out the Rachel Brand departure story, I'm acutely interested in whether she has a sense of what evidence Mueller has.
-
-
-
She's not supposed to be in that loop, as I understand it, but they did bring her into the 702 reauthorization so maybe she was move involved in NatSec things than a normal AAG would be.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you think Tribe is correct that Francisco being next in line for DAG increases the odds Trump tries to fire Rosenstein?
-
Hadn't seen the piece but yes, it is more likely.
-
just a tweet. thanks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yah, that’s kind of a crucial question as it relates to her departure decision, isn’t it? Although I would say it’s just as likely this overall shit(wipe) show would be enough to drive any sane person who cares about working for the next 20 years out of this administration
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, Rosentsein does and maybe she just had to look him in the eyes to know. They are the FBI, her job is to have acute perception.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe she's in the loop on what Mueller has re: Sessions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe she helped gather it and is now “done”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One would think she does.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.