This part of the Fox faux scandal seems to have been missed. Deripaska asked for immunity, didn't get it. didn't testify.pic.twitter.com/Y8W43wqDX2
-
Why would he need immunity to testify to a legislative body? What crime has he committed?
Perhaps you should ask him and his lawyer, because he apparently thought he had criminal exposure.
-
-
Not much of a ‘Source’ for a story about kompromat was he?
-
Again, you seem not to be even pretending to think this through. Also, again, who am I to tell Deripaska and his lawyer his fear of criminal exposure was wrong?
-
What was criminal supposedly exposing dirt on a Pres candidate? I have thought many many times about this entire debacle. No Russian agent would EVER expose if they had kompromat on an official. Ever. That would nullify the entire point of kompromat. The entire thing is a lie
-
AGAIN, Deripaska appears to have a very different sense than you of the kinds of crimes involved here. Hint: he probably has a better idea of what he did.
-
Lied to Sid Blumenthal? Steele? Things are going poorly for the opposing theory....time will tell.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.