It’s worth tracking their levels of agitation as a metric of how close Mueller and the Dems are getting to exposing the truth
Agree. Read York too. He's especially useful for reading between the lines (as always). https://twitter.com/russiaexplainer/status/961662163898290177 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
That's not why I recommend you read them. They all have stuff to teach people.
-
Such as?
-
@emptywheel do you go along with this? Asking sincerely.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-what-explains-the-fbis-deep-faith-in-trump-dossier-author-christopher-steele/article/2648488 … -
When I advocate people reading stuff they disagree with, I'm not generally suggesting I'm "going along with" it.
-
Yeah. I get that you're not advocating a particular perspective. I'm asking if you happen yo agree w York here re: his take right regarding Steele lying? About FBI reliance on steele?
-
I said when news of the referral came out that it would pertain to whether he spoke to the press. I think York misrepresents some of the explanations. And doesn't account for how DOJ generally bases corroboration on source reliability.
-
Agree with that first list wholeheartedly. Especially Chuck. Lose me with York. He seems to be more than willing to be purposefully dishonest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.