Note: The subject of a CI investigation will now be sent a detailed memo describing the evidence that the FBI had against a suspected co-conspirator at four different points in time.
-
See the 2013 indictment of Buryakov in SDNY. Who is UCE-1? Answer: Pagehttps://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/evgeny-buryakov-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-connection-conspiracy-work …
Except that's not what he has confessed to being (he has confessed to Male-1). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-trump-adviser-admits-to-2015-communication-with-russian-spy/2017/04/04/a09d7384-193b-11e7-9887-1a5314b56a08_story.html … And that's not what that code means.
-
-
Read the Justice Dept Presser. 9th Paragraph down. That is exactly what code means, or Justice Dept is in error on their own case. WAPO is garbage. http://httpsww.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/evgeny-buryakov-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-connection-conspiracy-work …
-
WaPo, quoting Page himself, is garbage? Perhaps you should listen to Carter Page bc he was there.
-
Male-1 in the actual indictment and the UCE-1 in the press release you apparently refuse to read are not mutually exclusive.pic.twitter.com/8QQf6Y33Dp
-
That's not actually how pseudos in indictments work.
-
So who is "FBI Undercover Employee-1" the DOJ Presser is referring to then? Some other guy who was involved that sounds just like Page, but isn't?
-
Um. He's undercover. Which is one reason we know he wasn't Page.
-
We didn't know he was Page in 2013...nor in Mar 2016 when that plea presser was released...how does that exclude possibility of Page? Not feasible to believe that FBI converted him to an asset in early 2013?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.