If the US's ability to deter foreign hackers is incompatible with other countries' democratic laws, that's the US's problem. The US doesn't own the world. There's absolutely no reason why Lauri can't be tried and prosecuted in the UK, as I was in 2011.https://twitter.com/MichaelSSmithII/status/960582148511141888 …
-
-
The weirdest part of the case is that having Inspire is illegal in UK, but is not here. So it would arguably have been easier to prosecute him in UK.
-
It's the same for hacking too. US regularly has to bend laws to prosecute hackers, whereas UK's Serious Crime Act of 2009 explicitly makes basically everything illegal even common security research practices.
-
Well, they're making new stretches in your case. So you can take some pride that they're having to do EXTRA backflips.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
May failed in Pham's case bc that actually would have left him stateless--he no longer had Vietnamese citizenship. But in other cases May stripped Somalis, of UK citizenship, sent them back to Somalia, then the US drone killed them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.