If the US's ability to deter foreign hackers is incompatible with other countries' democratic laws, that's the US's problem. The US doesn't own the world. There's absolutely no reason why Lauri can't be tried and prosecuted in the UK, as I was in 2011.https://twitter.com/MichaelSSmithII/status/960582148511141888 …
-
-
Well, I did say "arbitrarily". Until the forum bar, the US-UK extradition treaty was extremely one-sided towards the US (and still is to an extent), there was very little possible grounds to challenge US extraditions.
-
Wasn't the forum bar in place before Minh Quang Pham (Vietnamese immigrant who worked on AQAP's Inspire for a few months) was extradited?
-
I'm not familiar with that case. I'm not saying the system is perfect, but this was an important victory that sets a precedent for other people that might find themselves in a similar situation to
@laurilove. -
It was pretty bad. He was detained when he returned to UK fr Yemen, wandered around for 6 months, then May tried to strip his UK citizenship, then shipped him over here.
-
The weirdest part of the case is that having Inspire is illegal in UK, but is not here. So it would arguably have been easier to prosecute him in UK.
-
It's the same for hacking too. US regularly has to bend laws to prosecute hackers, whereas UK's Serious Crime Act of 2009 explicitly makes basically everything illegal even common security research practices.
-
Well, they're making new stretches in your case. So you can take some pride that they're having to do EXTRA backflips.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Probably so that once I get out of this conviction I'll be sent home and they can try me again, because fuck MalwareTech.
-
You weren't brought here so you could surf year round?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.