Far too little attention has been paid to the way Nunes and Ryan are making sure that witnesses will be (justifiably) afraid to cooperate with the FBI.https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/959268185156579328 …
-
That's funny. Right now on Morning Joe they have Natasha Bertrand on (who has no knowledge of what's in the memo herself) going on and on saying that Nunes' memo is a fraud because he hasn't seen ANYTHING. She even said ONLY ADAM SCHIFF has.
You'll note I said Nunes' staffers? You'll agree his staffers are not him? Also, Gowdy has seen the documents (Nunes may have seen one, the most sensitive one). He says people should back off the Mueller investigation bc of the seriousness of the spying it is investigating.
-
-
And you are arguing Nunes' STAFFERS got access to EVERYTHING ... which is simply a BASELESS claim and as I said, ironically at the very moment you say this, another babbling person who has NO ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE of any of this ranting the EXACT OPPOSITE to claim the memo is a fraud
-
Except a letter from Nunes to Rosenstein says just that. You're saying Nunes is a liar? Okay, we agree on that.
-
A letter from Nunes to Rosenstein say just what, exactly?
-
That is clearly a reference to FBI documents. Not Mueller's investigative files.
-
Know who's doing Mueller's investigation? FBI Agents.
-
But the documents referred to in the above - are FBI documents that are not Mueller Investigation documents. But documents of the activities of the FBI itself (and in particular - documents that mostly would have been from BEFORE Mueller was even appointed).
-
Nunes demanded anything about Russian influence on election. You're saying Mueller is not investigating that?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And I don't care what Gowdy has said about the Mueller investigation. Although I do hold the position that there was no LEGITIMATE BASIS to appoint a Special Counsel in this matter and that it was an UNWISE and UNJUSTIFIED action.
-
So you don't care what just one of two House GOPers who have actually reviewed the evidence on the spies targeting Trump has to say?
-
And what doesn't MATTER to me - is whatever opinion Gowdy may have on the Mueller investigation (whether he is right or wrong or somewhere in between). I am capable of making my own judgments on such matters.
-
Except you haven't seen the documents. He has. Also, he's a lawyer.
-
I haven't seen the documents. I want to see the documents. And he has NOT been provided ALL the documents (as you allege). I think he OUGHT to be provided such. As for what he says about what he has seen - I do pay attention to all statements from all who have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And Mueller is not investigating "spying." Whereas the topic of the memo is - as stated by those who have read it - about the MISUSE of spying powers. Which is of EXTREME SIGNIFICANCE and CONCERN.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whereas the issue of using the powers of domestic spying (which ought not to exist in the first place) to spy on a political opponent - is the BIGGEST SCANDAL in American History. It is an unacceptable abuse of authority. Period. Whoever either party may be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.