Op-ed by HPSCI ranking member Adam Schiff in the ongoing Nunes memo nonsensehttps://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/958869046568669185?ref_src=twcamp%5Ecopy%7Ctwsrc%5Eandroid%7Ctwgr%5Ecopy%7Ctwcon%5E7090%7Ctwterm%5E0 …
-
-
It's House rules, so courts won't get involved. And even if the rules were broken, the recourse would be to the speaker, and Ryan seems perfectly happy to let all of this continue; he could shut a lot of this nonsense down in an instant if he chose to do so.
-
No. It's also that Nunes might be at risk of obstruction if he weren't protected as another branch. Nunes is the one Trump flunkie who--probably correctly--hasn't exposed himself to legal risk.
-
The house rules are whether Nunes would be sanctioned by the house for disclosure; he could disclose under S&D even if doing so was grossly against the rules without taking on criminal liability.
-
Again, I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about the deference DOJ gives to investigations implicating Congress and Congress' ability to shield its own.
-
Know who got to decide SSCI wasn't going to cooperate w/FBI's investigation of Merlin leak, in which SSCI staffer was top suspect, over Jeffrey Sterling? SSCI Chair.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Especially filthy is a better description.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wonderd about S&D's specifics. Seems not applicable for actual crimes. Crimes like obstruction of justice for example. https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/26/privilege-from-arrest …pic.twitter.com/KBPjchIO6t
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.