Can someone explain these two details?pic.twitter.com/xVtY7oCcs3
Show this thread
The "dangerous precedent" Rosenstein is talking about is letting some defendants see FISA apps -- which was actually the intent of Congress in 1978.
Maybe something GOOD will come out of this stupid #ReleaseTheMemo fiasco.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/justice-dept-officials-appealed-to-white-house-to-halt-release-of-memo-alleging-fbi-abuses-related-to-author-of-trump-dossier/2018/01/30/32f9d15a-060d-11e8-ae28-e370b74ea9a7_story.html …pic.twitter.com/Kx1QrCILnW
-
-
-
Also, can we stop reinforcing the WH's desired narrative that Trump is only in danger for obstruction? He has told friends he's safe bc Manafort won't flip on him--that's not abt obstruction.pic.twitter.com/sKNEZHWscd
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Should we be letting the accused in on the evidence against them? Seems awfully liberal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.