emptywheel

No. I think she definitely violated FRA. But then so has Trump's Admin already, so did W's. I'd like to put teeth to THAT. But intent was not clear here.

Lmao. You’re hilarious.

You're saying you've got proof Hillary's intent was to get hacked so Russia could get classified information that was not marked as such?

What???? You just pulled that right out of your ass.

No. Unless you have proof of that you don't have the basis to charge her. THAT's the point. Her ill-intent was abt violating FRA, not sharing classified info improperly (which was Petraeus' intent).

She willfully set up a server. She was completely careless in the handling. It’s irrelevant whether she intended to transmit classified data. She knew she would be, OR she’s the single dumbest human being ever. Which is it?

It's not irrelevant. That's why she wasn't charged. Petraeus, however, KNEW that he was keeping notebooks with covert operatives IDs and code word intelligence in an unlocked desk drawer. That's the difference. Careless =/= willful mishandling of code word intel.

It was irrelevant and that’s why she *should* have been charged. Everybody that’s being honest about this, knows this.