And if you're not a lawyer why are you certain the GOP FBI agents who decided Hillary couldn't be charged were wrong?
-
She willfully set up a server. She was completely careless in the handling. It’s irrelevant whether she intended to transmit classified data. She knew she would be, OR she’s the single dumbest human being ever. Which is it?
It's not irrelevant. That's why she wasn't charged. Petraeus, however, KNEW that he was keeping notebooks with covert operatives IDs and code word intelligence in an unlocked desk drawer. That's the difference. Careless =/= willful mishandling of code word intel.
-
-
It was irrelevant and that’s why she *should* have been charged. Everybody that’s being honest about this, knows this.
-
As you said, you're not a lawyer. You apparently don't track this stuff very closely, either. Bc mishandling w/o intent (Hillary) actually is treated as less serious than mishandling w/intent (Petraeus).
-
I’m not a lawyer but I’m not drooling stupid either. She’s not in prison for 2 reasons. A. She’s Hillary Clinton and B. She was running against Trump. That’s the reality. End of story.
-
I get that you believe that. And yet the FBI did far more to attack her campaign than it did to attack Trump's.
-
How? By being honest? Lol
-
You would have supported FBI making an announcement on October 27 that a Trump aide had been offered dirt in the form of Hillary emails even before DNC responded to being hacked, then?
-
If they could prove it, absolutely. I do believe LE should be 100% removed from politics and care only about the law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.