You're suggesting the FBI that 1) made comments about Hillary of the type specifically prohibited on July 5 2) sent another letter of the type prohibited on October 27 BECAUSE so many Agents were already leaking was weaponized against TRUMP? Are you sure?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
What are you talking about with “comments specifically prohibited”?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kronykal
DOJ generally does not permit comments about people who've not been charged, and it generally does not permit comments abt investigations in lead up to those investigations. Both happened w/Hillary.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Comey isn’t in prison, so while it may be frowned upon it’s clearly not illegal, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Kronykal
Neither is approving a FISA application because you invested too much faith in the past track record of a private intelligence consultant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I’m no lawyer. Never claimed to be. But I hear a lot of “people need to go to jail” over this memo, from people who have seen it, so I’m going to go ahead and wait and see.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kronykal
The people who're saying that haven't seen the underlying documents. Even if THEY are lawyers, saying someone should go to jail w/o seeing the underlying evidence is like a doctor DXing Trump w/parkinsons by watching TV.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. And neither I nor they WILL look at the underlying intel, so neither I nor they will get a chance to decide whether anyone should go to jail. But unlike them, I do know enough abt FISA to understand how it works.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Somebody is going to go to jail. It’s just a matter of who at this point.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.