This seems like semantics. Some seem to have been verified...
-
-
-
"Seem" because nothing in the public record backs them?
-
Fair enough. I made a flimsy claim and realized I hadn't even read the dossier since it was first released. Yeah, you're right in that none of the claims have been proven (publicly, at least). Russia cultivating Trump seems closest, but far from smoking gun...
-
I think there's a lot of evidence to back that--but none of the evidence that does shows up in the dossier.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How has ever said that the Steele dossier is verified?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also been neither proven nor disproven that Mark Warner beats his wife. As long as that sits out there, there's going to be a cloud over his Senate seat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, Senate Intel isn't wasting its time doing a parallel obstruction inquiry, *so Warner's referring to new documents that aren't about obstruction."* Which means they raise further questions about a criminal conspiracy.... https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/29/mark-warner-global-politico-216545 …pic.twitter.com/nDn52iNSH2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think
@aaronjmate is winning!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where there's truthiness, there's truth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was lying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
pee tape was too good to be true :(
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.