Great worked example of the prove it trap in action. 1) what info does this report give away? 2) what ops might be burned by this? Should we care? 3) who is persuaded by this who wasn't persuaded last week? 4) what do we learn?https://twitter.com/ReutersWorld/status/956654692452438016?ref_src=twcamp%5Ecopy%7Ctwsrc%5Eandroid%7Ctwgr%5Ecopy%7Ctwcon%5E7090%7Ctwterm%5E0 …
-
-
GRU in the sanction list, not SVR.
-
FSB is, sort of. But yes, SVR is not mentioned in ICA at all. One of the reasons I was hammering Sanger. Won't be the only thing in ICA that doesn't bear out, I suspect. Suspect we'll also learn US IC kept this review too compartmented.
-
Oops. That "bear out" was in no way intended to be punny.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.