I'm not saying they need explaining. Many are self-explanatory, like the "F Trump" ones. I'm saying that they should be acknowledged rather than ignored or downplayed.
-
-
Replying to @ChuckRossDC
They showed they didn't like Trump (and other pols)--you know, like the entire NY FBI didn't like Hillary, which is unsurprising bc FBI Agents tend to be GOP. And?
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ChuckRossDC
When Mueller/Horowitz found that they had very normal opinions on politics, they were removed. Which means...the system worked. Sure. Let's talk about the system working, shall we? Maybe you should ask why GOPers are ignoring the real basics?
4 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ChuckRossDC
You really think they were removed only because they had political opinions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShanaLin4 @ChuckRossDC
You have evidence contrary to what has been presented? Or you're making it up?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
everything she has said is based on the facts as we know them. you are way outmatched here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Please show me evidence that Strzok was reassigned based solely on his texts.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
i could have picked from every news outlet but here is one from fox so you cant cry fake news like every MAGA chud. https://m.youtube.com › watch?v=BTaG8kf--xc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You may not realize this but you're proving my point. Good night.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.