But his subject was how these and others interviews might mean the obstruction PART of the investigation is wrapping up. Ergo he understands there are other parts.
In which a former prosecutor doesn't get that this investigation is not *just* about obstruction nor does this excerpt pertain exclusively to it. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/01/23/on-sessions-and-trump-interviews-its-not-just-obstruction/ …https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/956160866373853185 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great job Marci!
@JillWineBanks@AriMelber@MaddowBlog@NatashaBertrandThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
his prior thread says ~ from what we know the invst re Trump is in re obstruction. i'm not certain why he believes this but that is a distinction he is making.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@renato_mariotti given likely defense source of the NBC report it’s notable that McCabe came up as being involved in the initial scheduling and Strozk in context of the flynnterview . More attempts to discredit investigation and explains the criticism of M& S over last months. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I love you both. He focused on something and explained it well to us laymen. Like you often do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.