I was interviewed at length for this Glenn Greenwald piece. I spoke abt gender. I also compared Greenwald's skepticism of the RU story w/my increasing focus on it, w/o losing focus on civil liberties. Count how many women quoted in it.http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/glenn-greenwald-russia-investigation.html?utm_campaign=nym&utm_medium=s1&utm_source=tw …
-
-
I quite like Klein and Yglesias (I'm open to arguments why I shouldn't) but it's incredibly telling that space was found to quote them as being unwilling to comment, but not to quote any woman who had something to say. And this isn't even really their beat, either of them!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting how Glenn's take on RU (which I also subscribe to) gets all the negative press. Do you experience a lot of pushback for your RU weedy analysis? Maybe your RU take is still acceptable?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course, because Greenwald is a RU tool.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In comments, there seems to be a common view that an article about you would be more interesting than an article about Greenwald (whom I once admired very much).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.