may have the answer today in this dutch news story: dutch intel says hack was SVR-directed https://www.volkskrant.nl/tech/dutch-agencies-provide-crucial-intel-about-russia-s-interference-in-us-elections~a4561913/ …pic.twitter.com/kqksOn9sA9
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
may have the answer today in this dutch news story: dutch intel says hack was SVR-directed https://www.volkskrant.nl/tech/dutch-agencies-provide-crucial-intel-about-russia-s-interference-in-us-elections~a4561913/ …pic.twitter.com/kqksOn9sA9
Yup. There are several reasons, if that's the case, the IC should correct the ICA.
Or some other agency, strong and audacious and confident that its false attribution tools can't be noticed, so it can play with any actor in cyberspace. Knowing even the best experts will be sure hacks came from that targeted actor, and not from them.



I sincerely appreciate your work. Thank you.
The confusion being maybe accused are all ex-FSB (Dukes et al) and Major Mikhailovich was SVR? As you know FSB is internal. But they will say none of it was sanctioned/official. Is Fancy Bear TAO of GRU?
at that time SVR and GRU fusioned into a mgb called buero lacking fsb to be like KGB.
Have you checked with VIP - Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity - and Ray McGovern on this?
The GRU and FSB didn't break into anything. They used computers and paid their internet bill.
The true problem with this is the absurd notion that the congressional investigations actually did any sort of analysis of the DNC hack. There's no indication that they spoke with anyone at Crowdstrike, or analyzed any of the metadata from Guccifer 2.0.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.