I feel like a lot of responses to this piece by @jacklgoldsmith & @Susan_Hennessey are missing this graf https://lawfareblog.com/merits-supporting-702-reauthorization-despite-worries-about-trump-and-rule-law …pic.twitter.com/aQmf2DX1fv
-
Is it, or is it not, the case that people (and I've got a number of people in mind) who got prosecuted off stuff that came in largely for an Intel function? In at least two cases, erroneously, I'll add.
I understand--bc I was the first to report--on the full investigation intake. But that doesn't protect against related information being used in ways that are problematic.
-
-
It's the "launder" term to which I take exception. That suggests 702 is being used to get around the warrant requirement and that is absolutely not the case.
-
Which one? The one on Tor nodes? The one on comms for which a significant purpose is FI? The ones for accessing the comms of people about whom FBI has no evidence of wrongdoing? Bc yes, it is used for that purpose, which is the complaint.
-
For this *particular* use, I'm happy to use "parallel construction," if you prefer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.