.@lawfareblog still hasn't retracted the demonstrably false claim--one I've corrected @Susan_Hennessey on over and over--that NSA fixed "abouts" before it became public. That is false and should be retracted, w/correction notice.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/954088751122255874 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @lawfareblog
We didn't say it was fixed before it became public. We said the system self-identified the problem long before public disclosure and self-reported before it become public.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @lawfareblog
emptywheel Retweeted Susan Hennessey
So it is your position that knowingly violating Bates' rules for 5 years and only moving to learn how bad the problem was after 4 is a sign of self-correction? Help me understand what you're celebrating here.https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/954102376788643840 …
emptywheel added,
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @lawfareblog
My position is that you misread the sentence you are calling false and that it is not false, but accurate. No more, no less.
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @lawfareblog
Okay. But all the sentence says then is that "because NSA operates in secret we can guarantee that we can continue Fourth Amendment violations for years and still get credit for self-fixing." It's actually proof that this program is abused (and was, while you were at NSA).
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
Moreover, it is still false that certain parts of the violations (such as that some queries were not audited, IDd in 1/2017) were found b4 made public.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.