We didn't say it was fixed before it became public. We said the system self-identified the problem long before public disclosure and self-reported before it become public.
-
-
-
So it is your position that knowingly violating Bates' rules for 5 years and only moving to learn how bad the problem was after 4 is a sign of self-correction? Help me understand what you're celebrating here.https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/954102376788643840 …
-
Because what you seem to be saying is, "Once Edward Snowden brought about a 3 year delay on transparency into knowing violations of the law, once NSA no longer operated in secret, NSA moved to fix things."
-
Not to mention the fact that Colllyer's refusal to appoint an amicus (something you've cheered) probably means the violations predictably continue.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile, no one has retracted the false claim that the Senate didn't provide enough time for debate on
#FISA702. -
Take it up with someone who is focused on that.
-
Just saying there seems to be an intransigency pandemic.
-
Asking people who have not made a claim to fix is seems like a bad approach. Asking someone who makes the same demonstrably false claim over and over to fix it seems like a better one, no?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel I'm guessing that you are not an NSA expert like Susan... Don't troll the experts unless you have knowledge of the subject. -
I'm not? Then why do I apparently know more about their abuses than she does?
-
If you've never worked for the NSA, then I rest my case...
-
Or maybe if you've worked for the NSA, you are more likely to launder their POV
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.