I think we need to know more about who was presiding when the subpoena was issued. Alternate theory, Conway pissed at Bannon's arrogant non-answers, decided to make him talk.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/953350702725763075 …
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Possible. Tho thus far no committee has subpoenaed other witnesses for using precisely the same tactic (incl Sessions, Rogers, Coats, Rosenstein, and others).
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
At some point, there's a straw that the camel cannot take.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Conaway can't subpoena w/o Nunes in any case, can he?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Under the rules the full committee can vote out a subpoena, even without the Chairman.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Gotcha. Let's see what has happened. The bad faith of HPSCI at this point is pretty staggering.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Let's distinguish between Nunes & HPSCI. HPSCI (w/Conway &
@RepAdamSchiff) has been trying to run a reasonable investigation. Nunes is demonstrating bad faith.3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
I'm not willing to make that distinction until I see evidence that merits it.
-
-
@ConawayTX11 has been helpful.@DevinNunes is the one thwarting.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.