he said he thought Prevezon "was winding down" clearly stating there was overlap.
Oh. Well then he can sue me but 1) no. 2) his underlying claim is ALSO false. and 3) the underlying point--that at least two Fusion people could have leaked news of dossier--is also true.
-
-
I am responding only to your tweets His underlying claim which we contest is tru. He told the truth. You are lying (repeatedly). None of my business if he sues you (also I'm not a lawyer).
-
And as I've said, I've got far more backing this point (including the records on payments) and so say what I do w/confidence. He didn't lie. He obfuscated abt real risk of tipping off RUs.
-
The point is not and never has been contested. Not be Simpson anyway. He didn't "suggest" what you falsely claim he "suggested".
-
Thanks for your vast assistance.
-
thanks for your patience anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.