To pre-empt some stupid questions. 1) Bush was interviewed during Plame case (to see if he ordered Libby to leak Plame's ID) 2) Cheney was interviewed 2X, 1X as GJ-like 3) Both got special privileges, most notably Cheney's "GJ" appearance was in Jackson Holehttps://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/950343859539767297 …
-
Show this thread
-
But this is pretty funny, not least bc they're still clinging to that "collusion-in-lieu-of-conspiracy" dodge. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/initial-talks-underway-about-trump-interview-mueller-russia-probe-n835506 …pic.twitter.com/bXJ0OpeUHi
3 replies 11 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
One other issue I haven't seen addressed. Nixon's alleged crimes were when he was POTUS Cheney's crimes w/Plame were when he was VPOTUS Trump's conspiracy actions, if any, spanned pre-and POTUS.
1 reply 12 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
Both Whitewater and Jones for Clinton were pre-POTUS, though, correct?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
IIRC Monica only came up in Jones depo as tangentially relevant to Jones. If I represent Trump, these precedents read together add up to “there’s no getting out of live testimony, but we will put hard guardrails around the topics we prep for and walk out if it gets off topic.”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, that'd be the logical response. But I think they're far more worried abt conspiracy questions than all the focus on obstruction makes out.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.