-
I think Goldstone was panicked about getting offed by the Russians in that, so I don't take it as anything akin to what his Mueller testimony was. But I do bet Akhmetshin (I agree you're right, it has to be him) got pulled back bc of Goldstone's testimony.
And the notion that something else got mentioned might explain why Manafort's notes reflect something on Republicans as well.
-
-
It also looks increasingly like the big cover story in July--which focused on Akhmetshin--was done to distract from Kaveladze's role.
-
Did you see this re: Kaveladze's attendance at a 2013 meeting in Las Vegas with Trump, Michael Cohen, the Agalarovs, and Goldstone?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At that point it’s not clear to me they had a functional voter file. The RNC did.
-
I was thinking it could be a reference to emails they could use to hurt GOPers. Carrot and stick.
-
RNC was hacked too, right? Or at least attempt was made and their security was supposedly better? That came straight from Trumps mouth.
-
Yeah, that's my point. If Russians are doing carrot and stick, mentioning that they'd be willing to release Hillary's but would hold the Republican ones would exert two kinds of pressure.
-
I’ve assumed it’s likely the Russians got some emails showing Repubs plotting against him. And I don’t meanbullshit like the DNC hacked emails, but active coordination against Trump, along with plenty of disdain & mockery. And/or the Russians got evidence of Repub criminality
-
They hacked Lindsey and Rubio.
-
Is this established to some degree, or informed speculation?
-
Documented. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/291317-gop-emails-leaked-on-site-connected-to-russian-hackers … Targeting of Rubio was made clear at a hearing.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.