This is a good summary of what a hack Nunes is (and has been, since he took over HPSCI). But can someone point to where article notes that Nunes was transition official? Seems like an important detail.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @emptywheel
And Adam Schiff isn't a hack. Please. Now the dossier is unimportant and finding out what the hell was going on makes you a hack. You were ok with the "investigation" that was supposed to sideline Nunes? Hack move, that one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dccaps8 @emptywheel
Steve, https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/10/19/in-defense-of-a-trump-tweet/ … https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/13/the-released-dossier-is-not-the-complete-dossier/ … There are plenty more. Apologize and kick in $100 to show you mean it. https://www.emptywheel.net/support/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @runtodaylight @emptywheel
I don't know if
@emptywheel is a genius or a fucking nut at this point. My point was that this whole collusion investigation seemed to rely on the dossier. The IC won't confirm or deny it which makes me want to know why. Ergo Nunes.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @runtodaylight
Ok. I'll bite...so they opened an investigation and got a FISA warrant to spy solely based on information outside the dossier. And all nefarious shit with Simpson/Ohr/ McCain was nothing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @runtodaylight
Well. It's secret and the FBI won't tell, so I don't know.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dccaps8 @runtodaylight
But you realize that the existence of one or more FISA orders (obtained at whatever point, including one potentially on Pap, who doesn't show up in dossier) =/= the entirety of investigation?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @runtodaylight
I guess so. But it makes me wonder what the whole investigation is based. If Mueller and the FBI are holding back the mother-load to drop on Trump they did a good job of hiding it. IC trying to pin the investigation on papadop (thru NYT, not you) is weak.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Go look at how NYT describes their sources. Then consider whether you'd like to revise what is going on here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.