And all but one of those 9 has no discernible relation to any person involved in the election. And Luke Harding reported the 9th had no tie to the dossier.
-
I’m referring to these two high-level officials (reported in NYT ~ 1 yr ago) arrested by Putin for treason. As article says, details weren’t given as to what specific incidence(s) the arrests are related to.https://nyti.ms/2ktLqj1
That's sort of a shitty article. Let me repeat. Do you know what the names of the two FSB officers arrested for treason are. And have you read the Yahoo indictment?
-
-
Yeah, as this MJ article from Sept points out, it’s not unusual to indict double-agent to provide a cover: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/09/yahoo-indictment-offers-clues-russia-election-hacking/ …
-
Or maybe that's what RU has done? How would you know?
-
Uh, because I have a wi-fi-equipped crystal ball that allows remote viewing of past events? ;) Obviously no one (except Putin & his inner circle) knows for sure: it’s all conjecture, based on circumstantial evidence.
-
That said, ex-KGB Col Putin should hang his head in shame if he DIDN’T record/document incriminating details of DT’s collusion w/him. Of course,Putin wouldn’t face impeachment & prison (!), but DT certainly would... that’s the ULTIMATE Kompromat on DT.https://twitter.com/feefer2/status/947229942978244608 …
-
Putin’s just playing with DT now, in a race to see whether Vladdie gets tired of trifling with his prey before he devours him (by dumping incriminating evidence via Wikileaks or other “publisher”) or if Mueller independently uncovers same evidence first...pic.twitter.com/Sn0CwCnwge
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.