Re: FBI revealing investigation into Hillary and not Trump. One was an investigation started in response to Congressional requests. The other was a CI investigation. You really wanted FBI to scream, "Hey Vlad!?!?!?! We're in your shorts so start killing the witnesses"?
-
-
It is suggested here. It makes sense that is where it would be since they were still in NYC at the time.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-ambassador-told-moscow-that-kushner-wanted-secret-communications-channel-with-kremlin/2017/05/26/520a14b4-422d-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html?utm_term=.a1de4fa2826a …
-
Can you point the specific language where this was "suggested"?
-
Read the article. It is about halfway through it. Do you want me to blow your nose for you, too?
-
Well, there's this passage which makes it clear that we spy on everything coming out of the Embassy, which says the opposite of what you are arguing. Perhaps work on your own nose first?pic.twitter.com/yN74ZaPfm1
-
I am aware of that. Nevertheless Kislyak talked about setting up the back channel through a diplomatic facility. Since Kushner was in NYC that would be the logical place.
-
Want me to quote you from later in the article where it said RU rejected the offer in part bc they WOULDN'T let Americans into their most secure spots?
-
I read it. A lot of people acted very illogically throughout this. Look at Flynn, for example. He should have been aware conversations with Kislyak would be taped yet he spoke with him then lied about it to the FBI.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.