Actually no evidence to support that.
-
We’re just going to have to disagree here and leave it there.
What we're having is not a disagreement. We're having a convo where you present no proof for assertions and I point out that many counterassertions have been publicly presented. AKA, you're talking shite. But yes, we can leave it *there.*
-
-
but your counterassertions have all been "this journalist said no." and then when pressed on other points, you said they might be related.
-
Hmmm. I'm pointing to things like an indictment in which there has been a guilty plea. But I guess that's fake, according to you folk.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No. You’re obfuscating and dismissing any counter argument without any analysis. That’s up to you but please take your attitude elsewhere. That’s always your prob: you mistake opinion for fact
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.