No, actually this is Chuck Johnson's lawyer asking to narrow SSCI request to exclude known participants in 2016 op. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/28/chuck-johnsons-narrowed-scope-of-what-a-russian-is/ …https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/946130278128455680 …
-
-
I read your post. SSCI's definition of who it deems relevant isn't limited to "Russian persons," it also includes persons operating on behalf of "Russian interests," so the Kazakh you mentioned wouldn't be excluded per this "narrowed" criteria.
-
He might! But glad that you now recognize that change you object to came in response to Johnson's lawyer's request. Maybe you should call him the xenophobe?
-
Actually Ike doesn't work for a Russian. He works for an Azeri.
-
He could be said to "represent Russian interests" according to this. And so, still implicated even with the purportedly "narrowed" criteria.pic.twitter.com/M1yXOF8rZl
-
He could. Except that Johnson, the guy who asked for this narrowing, gets to define it.
-
Constantly amazed by now Bad
@mtracey is at his job
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When you do what you love it isn't work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dude, we should be actively bombing Russia, not just investigating Russians.https://youtu.be/uyicuxcUsAQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.