No, actually this is Chuck Johnson's lawyer asking to narrow SSCI request to exclude known participants in 2016 op. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/28/chuck-johnsons-narrowed-scope-of-what-a-russian-is/ …https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/946130278128455680 …
-
-
Again, you're being Johnson's dupe. Congratulations for doing the work of a racist idiot.
-
I read your post. SSCI's definition of who it deems relevant isn't limited to "Russian persons," it also includes persons operating on behalf of "Russian interests," so the Kazakh you mentioned wouldn't be excluded per this "narrowed" criteria.
-
He might! But glad that you now recognize that change you object to came in response to Johnson's lawyer's request. Maybe you should call him the xenophobe?
-
Actually Ike doesn't work for a Russian. He works for an Azeri.
-
He could be said to "represent Russian interests" according to this. And so, still implicated even with the purportedly "narrowed" criteria.pic.twitter.com/M1yXOF8rZl
-
He could. Except that Johnson, the guy who asked for this narrowing, gets to define it.
-
Constantly amazed by now Bad
@mtracey is at his job
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1) How would the pre-"narrowed" phrase - "Russian persons" - have included Karim Baratov or Ike Kaveladze? 2) How is it "narrowing" the phrase "Russian persons" to include people of "Russian descent"? Sounds like an expansion. 3) Can one object & still hate Chuck Johnson?
-
Ultimately this lets the racist define who he believes to be Russian or acting on behalf thereof. And the case can be made for both Ike and Baratov.
-
The only one providing a definition of anything here is Doss.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.