And either way, is completely irrelevant to the most important point, which is that if any of it made its way into a FISA application, it's verified, corroborated, and true. Sorry, dude.
Show this thread
-
In his interview he specifically Said the FISA order.
Huh. No. In fact elsewhere clapper has said he didn't know everything abt FBI interview. You're just confused.
-
-
No I am not. Did you even read the article or see the interview by Litt? I don't think you did' you are confused and Clapper has said the Dossier wasn't used to begin their investigation into Russia/Trump.
-
When I get to a computer I'll annotate this to help you. Alternately you can make a screen cap of where it says fisa.
-
Right here he says they didn't rely on the dossier in "ANY WAY" and during the live interview I saw him do the interviewer asked him specifically if it was used for the FISA and he said no. I will see if I can find the tape for the interviewpic.twitter.com/wDCmdiYgxu
-
Again, what he's talking about there is the ICA Obama ordered up in December, not the FBI investigation.
-
Not sure why or how you are misreading it but He states it had nothing to do with their Starting the investigation. Sounds like you have an agenda but its based on a faulty assumption. Clapper said they were taping convos way before they got dossier
-
I'm not. You just are misreading it. But since you're so determined to remind confused I'll let you wallow here. Goodbye.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you would bother reading the Article Litt, the DNI's reiterated that Trump, then the president-elect, was briefed on the dossier's allegations in Jan not because the intelligence community relied on the dossier "in any way, or ----
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.