Hmmm... https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/10/three-months-after-problematic-john-sipher-post-just-security-makes-clear-it-let-clear-errors-sit-for-two/ …https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/944400957823168513 …
Show this thread
-
Evidently Andrew McCabe testified he felt at least part of the dossier was credible enough to be a valid investigative source.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-frustrated-lawmakers-pressed-fbis-mccabe-for-answers-on-trump-dossier-they-got-nothing/article/2644225 …
And then as the sole thing he pointed to which had proven true he pointed to Page, which FBI could have gotten by reading WaPo. "McCabe noted that the dossier said, accurately, that the unpaid, low-level Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page visited Moscow in July 2016."
-
-
Yes, saw that. I too am confused as to why the FBI seems intent to prop up the dossier. The Trump allies in Congress are effectively using it discredit the whole investigation. If I were them I'd forget about UraniumOne and stick to discrediting the dossier because it is working
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.