If it were me, I'd err on the side of "a dec 30 auth will hurt more than it helps". But then, maybe I'm a crazy optimist that Congress will manage in the next four months what if failed to so in the last twelve.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @pwnallthethings
Quite the optimism indeed. If they miss this deadline, we're into an election year. Why do you think anti-702ers are suddenly so enraptured with the April deadline being the operative one?
1 reply 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @pwnallthethings
Susan: As one I presume you include as being "enraptured," are you familiar with the PAA direct precedent? Or just attacking people who DO know it?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
I actually wasn't referring to you, as you've noted the dual deadline in the past. But my feed is positively overtaken with apparent newcomers to the April deadline, pushing it as a reason this is no big deal.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @pwnallthethings
Virtually everyone knowledgeable I know thinks there'll be short term. But April IS a reason this is no big deal. April, and the PAA precedent.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
Short term reauth that gets us past Nov 2018 would be reasonable solution to completely unreasonable mess they've created. Anything that sunsets prior and closer to Nov is just more gamesmanship on a total lapse. Call me a cynic but I presume it's part of the strategy.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @pwnallthethings
Who is "they"? The IC, that still hasn't briefed all staffers on what they're doing? The IC which won't even accept HJC, which is mostly lip service to reform?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
"They" is Congress and (moreso) the White House, which has entirely botched the interagency and Hill outreach and let easy compromise opportunities pass for no good reason.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @pwnallthethings
I"ll grant you the WH. But I actually think HJC engaged in good faith (and a great deal of work, even I don't like outcome). HPSCI refused it bc the IC told them to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
I agree HJC engaged in good faith. I just think their outcome did a whole lot of harm while offering very little meaningful reform (and take it you agree on at least the latter part).
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Agree on the latter part. Actually think Warner's solution (FISC rubber stamp) better than CRM only warrants, if only bc we'd get a real #. But not w/codification of Tor exception, which IMO should never be/have been permitted w/o debate.
-
-
My real hope is that the 9th rules you need criminal warrant for criminal usage in Gartenlaub, which would force debate on the issue.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.