I know the important thing is that Keeper's stupid SLAPP suit is an attempt to silence @dangoodin001. But I'm also curious when CA started giving citizenship and whether someone who lived there 7 years qualifies?pic.twitter.com/2C3fWgKNWu
-
To tack onto this, though diversity suits often use language "domiciled" or "resident" rather than "citizen," SCOTUS has said people domiciled in a state are "citizens" of that state (Sun Printing, 194 U.S. 377 (1904))pic.twitter.com/b6CDdPZI2t
Damnit. So I can't be a dual CA and MI citizen, like I can be a dual IR and US one?
-
-
Correct. Only one domicile--last state in which you dwelt with intent to remain dwelling there indefinitely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahaha, it's based on the *primary* domicil, but you probably wouldn't want to be simultaneously subject to suit in 2 states anyway
-
Eh, people tend to get sued under specific personal jurisdiction (such as Goodin here--subject to suit in IL because act occurred there) rather than general. Corps can be and often are dual citizens (place of incorporation and principal place of business, if different).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.