Oh well. Looks like 404(b)(1) extension it is.https://twitter.com/dnvolz/status/943559346427977729 …
Who is "they"? The IC, that still hasn't briefed all staffers on what they're doing? The IC which won't even accept HJC, which is mostly lip service to reform?
-
-
"They" is Congress and (moreso) the White House, which has entirely botched the interagency and Hill outreach and let easy compromise opportunities pass for no good reason.
-
I"ll grant you the WH. But I actually think HJC engaged in good faith (and a great deal of work, even I don't like outcome). HPSCI refused it bc the IC told them to.
-
I agree HJC engaged in good faith. I just think their outcome did a whole lot of harm while offering very little meaningful reform (and take it you agree on at least the latter part).
-
Agree on the latter part. Actually think Warner's solution (FISC rubber stamp) better than CRM only warrants, if only bc we'd get a real #. But not w/codification of Tor exception, which IMO should never be/have been permitted w/o debate.
-
My real hope is that the 9th rules you need criminal warrant for criminal usage in Gartenlaub, which would force debate on the issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.