It’s a dumb move to make an already tense situation worse. WannaCry ranks so much lower on my NK concern ladder than say, you know, ICBMs.
-
My point is I'm not buying that it's them. Typically their attacks have been much more targeted; there are nuances in the syntax of the code; it's been associated with a group that does frequent false flags; we have ulterior motives for blaming NK... that's where I'm sitting
I'm with you (not a tech, but pretty smart abt this). You gotta explain the non-Lazarus code AND the fact this didn't serve an NK purpose.
-
-
Non NK code could be from things they picked up from github, underground. Just because destructive attack hadn’t been an MO before doesn’t mean they can’t be behind it. Everyone’s gotta have an ace in the hole.
-
Sure. And exactly the opposite could be used to support the opposite, non NK attribution.
-
You’re also supposing that attribution was made solely based on malware analysis. There’s a lot more to it than that.
-
Please DO NOT assume what I'm supposing. I'm not. I've got far more going on here than you can imagine.
-
TY. Sorry. Short tempered abt this. Bc worried...
-
It’s all good. I’m short tempered due to driving all day. No worries.
-
Twitter, where people can actually still be decent to each other by recognizing each other as human. I love it! Ok, g'nite y'all. For real this time. I hope the world doesn't blow up before the morning! :D
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
eyo, I'm "not a tech" either, but I know some good ones. as I said earlier tonight, I don't actually know things; I just know people that know things, and I put it all together with a nice little bow on top ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.