Not specifically, but FBI Classification 105 is Foreign Counterintelligence.
-
-
Replying to @_rshapiro
It's come up a few times that when the CIA is involved, they ask any mention of them to be omitted under b(1) AND b(3) just to cover their bases.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @resentfultweet @_rshapiro
Yeah, b(3) because CIA Act and sometimes the NSAct, but just ugh, they cite CIA Act for _every_ thing (even GAO) and I hate it.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @_rshapiro
So my thinking is, if they didn't also include b(3), it isn't CIA.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @resentfultweet @_rshapiro
Other entries with that file number talk about IDing his P.O. box from a sensitive source, which seems pretty domestic/USPS to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @resentfultweet
Yeah, and the other Case ID on the document is a Classification 100, which is Domestic Security.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_rshapiro @resentfultweet
Subversive/Security Matters, Domestic Security, Internal Security, Terrorism Enterprise Investigations, and Domestic Terrorism, take yer pick.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @resentfultweet
Yup. Also one of the one most popular Classifications for COINTELPRO cases.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @resentfultweet @_rshapiro
"In 2012, a crack research unit was sent to prison for a crime they didn't commit. They promptly escaped from maximum security. Still wanted by the government they survive as historians of fortune. If no one else can help, and if you can find them…maybe you can hire Team Mosaic"
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
LOL
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.