it's weird the WSJ is posting this, don't their editorial board basically think mueller is the devil
Strzok and Page debating abt whether it was necessary to risk burning sources w/Trump or not actually is a pretty interesting explanation for "insurance" text.https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-fbi-agents-account-insurance-policy-text-referred-to-russia-probe-1513624580 …
-
-
-
Yes, but occasionally the Real Journalists are permitted to do their job.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Pervasive connections."
-
And that's before most of the dossier ones came out. (At 7/17, even assuming FBI got them right away.)
-
Exactly. Steele's stuff was making the rounds, of course, bolstered by sigint. They were seeing the writing on the wall, early.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
fbi hit back pretty hard today - this and revealing the counterintelligence warnings during the campaign.
-
I feel like the CI warning is a half-told story.
-
like how? of the lying-by-omission or the-best-is-yet-to-come variety?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed it is. It as much as admits that they had determined the outcome a year and a half ago and were merely debating how fast to get there.
-
Leaving that aside, I seem to remember an FBI investigation of great import where normal procedures were tossed aside in order to fit the outcome into an electoral timeline...
-
The result was so badly botched that it ended up pissing off absolutely everybody and making the FBI look like a giant clown show. Anybody else remember that one?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I do not get the fuss over this text--Strzok is stating his opinion that banking on a Trump election loss is like buying an insurance policy that will only pay out if you die before 40. In other words, a dumb idea. That's it--no "secret plan."
-
& yeah he's saying they need to do the work instead of just hoping the problem will go away with an election loss. But there's no actual "insurance policy" as in a secret plot....jeez...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Am I the only one who thought this was the obvious answer? "He's not gonna win" "but What IF?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.