Remember how one of the most aggressive prosecutors in the country, Patrick Fitzgerald, conducted criminal investigation involving Obama figures (Blago's attempt to purchase O's seat) w/o any of this squealing?
-
-
But it’s a myth that “he doesn’t leak” ... the most persuasive evidence, and there is a strand or two of it, to come out of his investigation leaked immediately to three outlets within days of discovery.
-
LOL. I guarantee you that's false. And the sources for what has "leaked" are defense sources.
-
Papadopolous email leaked to three outlets immediately in August. Only thing at all persuasive to me in the whole mess beyond some Cambridge Analytica stuff that is, essentially, being ignored because it has massive implications beyond Trump.
-
1) It leaked FROM defense people. 2) That you believe that's the most persuasive info is proof that far more damning info hasn't leaked.
-
Wherever it leaked from, it is the only persuasive thing from Mueller thus far and *it did leak*. He has full control of prosecutorial strategy but not evidence, it seems.
-
He DOES NOT have control over what witnesses release. That's so basic to understanding this, which you apparently don't. In any case, what you have actually proven (but don't understand) is that most persuasive stuff HASN'T leaked.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I could have told you congressional investigations are a joke. Just look at how many Benghazi investigations the GOP had. Dems are doing the same thing now. They are polticial and will always be polticial
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.