notification is typically against the law
-
-
Replying to @WatergateII @SLSmith000
The letter from the Trump lawyer says the request was in the form of a letter, not a subpoena - does that change requirements or limitations on compliance with such request?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @onesmallhand @SLSmith000
he wouldn't have been notified of any subpoena or search warrant. He can assume whatever he likes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WatergateII @SLSmith000
Got it. So your assumption is that there was a request of some legal standing in place beyond the request from the FBI ...? I'm not a lawyer, and appreciate the clarification.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @onesmallhand @SLSmith000
I am assuming that. I am also assuming that any such lawful request would have turned up way more data than whatever dude received via voluntary means from GSA.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WatergateII @SLSmith000
From
@emptywheel GSA said: “in using our devices,” transition team members were informed that materials “would not be held back in any law enforcement” actions. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/16/trump-transition-team-outraged-to-be-treated-as-transition-team/ …pic.twitter.com/BcxiBxI852
4 replies 20 retweets 32 likes
That's from @chrisgeidner.https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-trump-campaign-claims-a-federal-office-illegally-turned?utm_term=.lopYMeWda#.drN9pGOBq …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @WatergateII and
Thanks for the correction - was trying to attribute useful analysis from you as well.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.