It's going to be really fun to see these emails showing Trump installed a GSA GC to try to help cover up. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-616c-dcd4-a96b-756de2a90000 …pic.twitter.com/y1X2zj08oM
Show this thread
FBI used letters, not subpoenas, to obtain the emails. They're also suggesting FBI exploited illness of their cover-up GC to get them.pic.twitter.com/gpo9Cx1bE0
-
-
After spending 17 ¶s arguing they're not subject to things like PRA they now want to claim they get all the privileges tied to PRA.pic.twitter.com/2fIZr6rtU4
Show this thread -
Q: If FBI DID exploit 6 month exemption under SCA, will Trump finally fix it?
Show this thread -
This almost certainly is an accusation that NYT's copy of KT McFarland's emails came via the GSA production (I call bull). IF SO that means Trump withheld clearly responsive email.pic.twitter.com/Ch7ZQulLzF
Show this thread -
This only makes sense if there WERE privileged materials here. They're not actually claiming that.pic.twitter.com/phidpHZVcU
Show this thread -
Setting aside the question of whether SCO engaged in any misconduct here. Can some reporters get the WH on the record whether they agree w/sentiment that private parties decide what's privileged/responsive? Please?pic.twitter.com/5wAuVU7zrG
Show this thread -
-
Given that Sessions or Nunes might have been (tho I doubt) collected on here, I find it interesting they're citing congressional privilege (which they didn't in claimed privileges).pic.twitter.com/xuTrWnq1uP
Show this thread -
This is a fucking espionage related case. But the GOP doesn't think that implicates National Security. Also, that last line is for the Mueller firing case.pic.twitter.com/2lmBN82hiv
Show this thread -
Curious: nowhere in this letter does Kory Langhofer say whether he's writing in a legal function or a crisis communication one. I vote the latter.pic.twitter.com/lWuIl2Xaa0
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
English, for laypeople?
-
No legal process. It wouldn't have been necessary given the agreements they used under GSA.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this problematic? Should the GSA not have complied if the request did not have the legal standing of a subpoena?
-
They were probably fine.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.