FBI used letters, not subpoenas, to obtain the emails. They're also suggesting FBI exploited illness of their cover-up GC to get them.pic.twitter.com/gpo9Cx1bE0
Show this thread
It's going to be really fun to see these emails showing Trump installed a GSA GC to try to help cover up. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-616c-dcd4-a96b-756de2a90000 …pic.twitter.com/y1X2zj08oM
-
-
-
After spending 17 ¶s arguing they're not subject to things like PRA they now want to claim they get all the privileges tied to PRA.pic.twitter.com/2fIZr6rtU4
Show this thread -
Q: If FBI DID exploit 6 month exemption under SCA, will Trump finally fix it?
Show this thread -
This almost certainly is an accusation that NYT's copy of KT McFarland's emails came via the GSA production (I call bull). IF SO that means Trump withheld clearly responsive email.pic.twitter.com/Ch7ZQulLzF
Show this thread -
This only makes sense if there WERE privileged materials here. They're not actually claiming that.pic.twitter.com/phidpHZVcU
Show this thread -
Setting aside the question of whether SCO engaged in any misconduct here. Can some reporters get the WH on the record whether they agree w/sentiment that private parties decide what's privileged/responsive? Please?pic.twitter.com/5wAuVU7zrG
Show this thread -
-
Given that Sessions or Nunes might have been (tho I doubt) collected on here, I find it interesting they're citing congressional privilege (which they didn't in claimed privileges).pic.twitter.com/xuTrWnq1uP
Show this thread -
This is a fucking espionage related case. But the GOP doesn't think that implicates National Security. Also, that last line is for the Mueller firing case.pic.twitter.com/2lmBN82hiv
Show this thread -
Curious: nowhere in this letter does Kory Langhofer say whether he's writing in a legal function or a crisis communication one. I vote the latter.pic.twitter.com/lWuIl2Xaa0
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The career GSA guy is disputing the crisis comms version of events. GSA never agreed about ownership of emails, GSA made clear that the devices were subject to monitoring prior to issuance, etc.
-
Yup. Updated my main post.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah. that's not a very interesting thread.
-
Except he is a former federal DA that goes on MSNBC so he has high visibiliy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Ever logged on to a Fed govt computer to be greeted at login with disclaimer "subject to monitoring" and "penalty for misuse." Yeah...
-
& Regarding GSA, has Trump Co been "punching down" on responsibilities to GSA & taxpayers on the leased DC post offive hotel? Bills current?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If there's a real legal argument they should be in court. They're not in court, b/c this is all political BS. When the facts are on your side, argue the facts. When the law is on your side, argue the law. When neither the facts or law are on your side, create confusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they weren't covering something up, they would release the documents. The only reason to keep them is if they are incriminating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s TFA?
-
Trump For America - the non-profit organization running the transition
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.