Speaking for myself, that's a possibility, but that scenario suffers a bit from the fact that Strzok sent the anti-Trump texts before the Russia investigation was opened. He went in as an anti-Trumper, didn't become one based on what he saw.https://twitter.com/pierre/status/942103557754404864 …
-
Maybe. But Strzok's early texts seemed more like a disdain for him as a person rather than as a natsec threat. Granted, it's a fool's errand to try to interpret his mindset based on the texts, but it's all we have right now
I agree there's cause to be concerned, tho question how concerned we should get from out of context texts. But I've talked to former Feebs far more remote than Strzok would be who've raised the years that FBI has been sniffing around Trump corruption.
-
-
The case will/won't be made on evidence. Unless the evidence was manufactured or manipulated, WTF r we talking about. People have opinions?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Have they released all the texts? Or just selectively released some? Because that seems like the opposite of transparency if it's just selectively.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.