Horowitz's letter to Grassley and Johnson says they were FBI-issued phones: https://goo.gl/AKURpg
-
-
Replying to @McDeereUSA @emptywheel
Thanks, that's the letter I'd seen referenced but couldn't find. So weird to use USG device like this, but maybe related to wanting to conceal communications from a spouse.
1 reply 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Right. That was Handel's implication. BECAUSE they used Hillary investigation subject lines they believed they'd be classified. Oops.
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I don't think it's possible to text from the high-side/classified enabled devices (just email), but this could apply to thinking they'd be withheld as LE sensitive or similar.
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
I think that's it, yeah. Tho does that say Hillary investigation stuff wasn't high side?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Honestly, I'm so confused not sure what conclusions to draw (also FBI practice with the phones could be different from agencies I'm familiar with). I do think (1) scandal element is pure nonsense and (2) these people showed astoundingly bad judgment.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Absolutely agree on 2. I'm sympathetic to those who say we can't decide whether there is a scandal until we understand "insurance" comment. And until we see Trump investigation era ones. We don't know yet. Nor does Horowitz or we'd have a report.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
That's fair, though even under the worst assumptions, I struggle to see what undetected malfeasance by either of those two could have actually materially impacted the under-a-microscope Russia investigation.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
I think the questions about the dossier are very very real. So if Strzok had a role in that being used, it may be one thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
haven't you said in the past most of the dossier info was publicly available info? I think questions on the dossier legitimacy are a bit odd given that we know quite a bit of it is mirrored in real reporting. can question fusion's motives perhaps. Steele is separate.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Not exactly. I've said a lot DOESN'T match reality. What does was public. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/10/three-months-after-problematic-john-sipher-post-just-security-makes-clear-it-let-clear-errors-sit-for-two/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.