Oh my. I meant something that wasn't an analytical shitshow. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/06/john-siphers-garbage-post-arguing-the-steele-dossier-isnt-garbage/ …
-
Citation needed, preferably Congressional testimony.
Let's take a step back. The proper way to ask for a citation to something you're ignorant of, even while you argue in contradiction to it, is, "May I have a citation for that, please." I'm not your research assistant, and won't respond to dickish orders.
-
-
I feel no obligation to be polite to someone who refers to another’s work as a “shitshow.”
-
And thus far I've backed that reference with a bunch of extra links, to things you appeared ignorant of. And you ... still can't explain how a December report can predict October events. So do your own work or wallow in ignorance then, if you refuse to be marginally civil.
-
Your claim that Sipher used a December report to say it predicted October events is bizarre. He doesn’t do that, and your case that he did is pure assertion with none evidence. It’s barely even coherent.
-
Oh my. Really? If I show you where he does it, all slow like so you'll understand it, promise you'll go away and do your homework b4 you continue to litter my TL?
-
Sure. Despite the snark, I am paying attention.
-
I asked for a promise. You're giving that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.